<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What a Week for Online Poker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokersift.com/general-poker-articles/what-a-week-for-online-poker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokersift.com/general-poker-articles/what-a-week-for-online-poker/</link>
	<description>Home of the BigPoker Bloggers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greedo</title>
		<link>http://www.pokersift.com/general-poker-articles/what-a-week-for-online-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>greedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokersift.com/?p=374#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Why do you think Pokerstars is so safe?  The very fact that you can not datamine at PS makes finding out something like that almost impossible.  Just currious?  Alright off to the Bellagio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think Pokerstars is so safe?  The very fact that you can not datamine at PS makes finding out something like that almost impossible.  Just currious?  Alright off to the Bellagio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poker kat</title>
		<link>http://www.pokersift.com/general-poker-articles/what-a-week-for-online-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>poker kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokersift.com/?p=374#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had a chance to read the full article on 2+2 yet.  I just kind of skimmed it and read the cliff notes.

it&#039;s scary to think/know this really does exist.. it&#039;s not looking good for online poker.  regulation probably needs to happen to save it.  People aren&#039;t going to want to put their money on any site (new players anyway).

Also, how will this effect pros, sponsorships, and general money flow in the poker industry?

One more thing.... these spam posts have got to go.. they&#039;re really annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to read the full article on 2+2 yet.  I just kind of skimmed it and read the cliff notes.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s scary to think/know this really does exist.. it&#8217;s not looking good for online poker.  regulation probably needs to happen to save it.  People aren&#8217;t going to want to put their money on any site (new players anyway).</p>
<p>Also, how will this effect pros, sponsorships, and general money flow in the poker industry?</p>
<p>One more thing&#8230;. these spam posts have got to go.. they&#8217;re really annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verstehen</title>
		<link>http://www.pokersift.com/general-poker-articles/what-a-week-for-online-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Verstehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokersift.com/?p=374#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I&#039;ve been following these and yes it&#039;s pretty dire.  This makes me even more of a Pokertstars devotee since it&#039;s rather hard to imagine it happening there.  I just joined Ongame but ugh, after reading that I&#039;m not exactly fired up to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I&#8217;ve been following these and yes it&#8217;s pretty dire.  This makes me even more of a Pokertstars devotee since it&#8217;s rather hard to imagine it happening there.  I just joined Ongame but ugh, after reading that I&#8217;m not exactly fired up to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
